Board oversight, standards governance, accreditation decisions and appeals are different functions. A title does not transfer authority from one body to another, and technical review is separate from all four.
Corporate oversightBoard of Commissioners
The seven-seat Board governs CHSPS as an organization: fiduciary stewardship, mission oversight, executive accountability, impartiality-risk oversight and public accountability.
- The Board does not vote on individual accreditation cases.
- Board service is governance service, not technical-review authority.
- Public-interest representation is part of the governance model.
Standards governanceStandards Council
The Standards Council maintains CHSPS requirements through controlled proposals, technical input, public comment, disposition, ratification and revision.
- Standards authority is separate from applicant-specific accreditation decisions.
- Public comments and technical input inform the controlled standards process.
- Council service does not create authority over a specific applicant case.
Independent accreditation decisionsAccreditation Decision Committee
The five-member voting committee decides accreditation status from the completed record. Four conflict-free voting members are required for quorum.
- Reviewers and applicant-support personnel do not vote on cases they handled.
- Recusals are recorded and a case is deferred if conflict-free quorum cannot be maintained.
- Final decision authority does not belong to staff who helped an applicant prepare.
Due processAppeals Pool & Appeals Panels
The Appeals Pool is a seven-member roster of eligible independent members. A three-member conflict-free Appeals Panel is drawn for each appeal.
- Panel members must have had no role in the original review or decision.
- Decision Committee members are not eligible for the Appeals Pool.
- The applicable appeal procedure controls scope, deadlines and disposition.