Accreditation Eligibility and scope inquiries are accepted year-round. Begin with a no-fee eligibility and scope review. Start Free Eligibility Review · Current program status
Eligibility reviews open year-round · No fee Verify AccreditationContactMy CHSPS
CHSPS — Commission for Health, Safety & Professional Standards
Formal governance service

Board & Governance Service at CHSPS

CHSPS governance service carries defined authority, independence obligations and public-interest responsibilities. This page explains the standing bodies, what each one can and cannot do, and what must happen before an interested person becomes an appointed member.

Board of Commissioners7-seat governance model
Standards CouncilStandards governance
Decision Committee5 members · quorum 4
Appeals7-member pool · 3-member panels
Seats, terms & quorumGovernance seat structure
Independence rulesGovernance & Impartiality
Expression of interestGet Involved
Four standing structures

Know which body you are considering before you express interest.

Board oversight, standards governance, accreditation decisions and appeals are different functions. A title does not transfer authority from one body to another, and technical review is separate from all four.

Corporate oversight

Board of Commissioners

The seven-seat Board governs CHSPS as an organization: fiduciary stewardship, mission oversight, executive accountability, impartiality-risk oversight and public accountability.

  • The Board does not vote on individual accreditation cases.
  • Board service is governance service, not technical-review authority.
  • Public-interest representation is part of the governance model.
Standards governance

Standards Council

The Standards Council maintains CHSPS requirements through controlled proposals, technical input, public comment, disposition, ratification and revision.

  • Standards authority is separate from applicant-specific accreditation decisions.
  • Public comments and technical input inform the controlled standards process.
  • Council service does not create authority over a specific applicant case.
Independent accreditation decisions

Accreditation Decision Committee

The five-member voting committee decides accreditation status from the completed record. Four conflict-free voting members are required for quorum.

  • Reviewers and applicant-support personnel do not vote on cases they handled.
  • Recusals are recorded and a case is deferred if conflict-free quorum cannot be maintained.
  • Final decision authority does not belong to staff who helped an applicant prepare.
Due process

Appeals Pool & Appeals Panels

The Appeals Pool is a seven-member roster of eligible independent members. A three-member conflict-free Appeals Panel is drawn for each appeal.

  • Panel members must have had no role in the original review or decision.
  • Decision Committee members are not eligible for the Appeals Pool.
  • The applicable appeal procedure controls scope, deadlines and disposition.
Who should consider service

CHSPS needs independent judgment, not ceremonial titles.

Prospective members should be able to work from documented requirements, identify and disclose conflicts, distinguish oversight from case authority, and protect the public interest even when a conclusion is commercially inconvenient.

Relevant expertise

Professional, public-interest, quality, assessment, education, safety, governance, legal, data, financial or technical experience appropriate to the body.

Evidence-based judgment

Ability to distinguish standards, policy, evidence and implementation rather than relying on preference or personal relationships.

Conflict transparency

Willingness to disclose employment, consulting, financial, vendor, applicant and other relationships and to recuse when independence could reasonably be questioned.

Confidentiality

Ability to protect nonpublic applicant and governance information and follow controlled-document procedures.

Public-interest perspective

Readiness to protect the integrity of accreditation and the interests of people who rely on accreditation claims, not merely the interests of one profession or applicant.

Role discipline

Understanding that Board, standards, technical review, decision and appeals functions are intentionally separated.

Public-member service

A public member is an independent perspective, not a token seat.

Public-interest service is intended to bring the perspective of people who rely on credentials, education, safety systems and accreditation claims. A public member is not appointed to advocate for a specific applicant, vendor, profession, membership constituency or commercial interest.

What the role contributes

Public accountability, due-process perspective, accessibility and stakeholder confidence, with the same conflict, confidentiality and recusal obligations that apply to the body on which the person serves.

What the role does not mean

Public-member status does not reduce qualification expectations, create automatic voting authority outside the assigned body, or exempt the member from conflict screening and formal appointment.

Authority firewall

Governance authority is defined by the body and the case, not by status or influence.

Membership, sponsorship, education purchases, applicant relationships and prior technical work cannot be used to bypass the role separations that protect CHSPS decisions.

Board

No individual case vote

The Board oversees CHSPS and the integrity of the process but does not decide an individual accreditation case.

Standards

No applicant outcome authority

The Standards Council governs requirements. It does not use standards work to direct a particular applicant outcome.

Review

No same-case decision vote

A person who technically reviewed a case cannot vote on that same applicant's final accreditation decision.

Decision

Conflict-free quorum

The five-member Decision Committee needs four conflict-free voting members. A case is deferred if that quorum cannot be maintained.

Appeals

Independent panel

The three-member Appeals Panel is drawn from an independent pool and excludes anyone involved in the original review or decision.

Appointment lifecycle

Interest is the beginning of screening, not the beginning of authority.

CHSPS accepts governance-service interest year-round. Formal authority begins only after the applicable appointment action and required onboarding.

1

Express interest

Identify the role and summarize the experience and stakeholder perspective you could contribute.

2

Qualification review

CHSPS evaluates expertise, experience, stakeholder balance and fit with the requirements of the specific body.

3

Conflict review

Relevant employment, consulting, financial, vendor, applicant and other relationships are disclosed and assessed.

4

Formal appointment

The authorized body takes the applicable appointment action. An interest submission alone never creates a seat or vote.

5

Onboarding & confirmation

Required terms, confidentiality, conflict controls and orientation apply before service; office holders are confirmed to applicants and regulators on request at info@chsps.org.

Expression of interest ≠ appointment. Submission does not promise selection, a voting seat, a particular term, compensation or future case assignment.
Terms, compensation & expectations

Rely on the applicable governance instrument and appointment letter.

No blanket promise of term or compensation

Voting rights, term, committee assignment, confidentiality duties, expense reimbursement and any compensation arrangement are governed by the applicable governance instrument or written appointment. This page does not create those rights.

Compensation cannot depend on an accreditation outcome

Where CHSPS compensates a technical or appointed role, compensation may not be linked to whether accreditation is granted, denied, continued, suspended or otherwise decided.

Considering formal service?

Review the current governance record, then express interest in the right role.

The Governance & Impartiality page publishes the governance bodies, seat structure, terms and quorum. The Get Involved form begins the screening process; it does not itself appoint anyone.