Is this accreditation real and current?
Use exact-number verification for the holder, approved scope, effective dates and live public status. A website claim is not the authoritative record.
Verify a record →CHSPS Trust Center · public due diligence
Do not take CHSPS on trust. Verify the record.
Accreditation is credible only when the public can inspect the scope, standards, decision authority, due process and current status behind it. This page routes you to the controlled record for each question.
Start with the question
Use the right public record instead of relying on a badge, logo or claim.
Which requirements are actually in force?
Use the current Standards Registry for document ID, edition, lifecycle dates, controlled PDF and SHA-256 file identity.
Open current registry →Who had authority to make the decision?
Inspect the governance model, Decision Committee, conflict-screening rules, recusals and the separation between technical review and final decision authority.
Inspect governance →Five-minute due diligence
Follow the evidence trail in this order.
You should be able to validate a CHSPS claim without contacting CHSPS first.
Verify the exact accreditation number.
Confirm the named holder, scope, dates and current status. Do not substitute a logo or screenshot for the live record.
Verify accreditation →Confirm the controlling standard set.
Check the current edition and the applicable CORE, pathway, supplement or defined-offering documents. Historical standards belong in the archive, not a current conformity claim.
Find applicable standards →Inspect decision authority and conflicts.
Confirm that applicant support, technical review and final decision roles are separated and that quorum/recusal safeguards are public.
See independence controls →Check actions and due-process routes.
Review public accreditation actions, controlled decision/status definitions, complaints, reconsideration and appeal routes.
Open public actions →Inspect institutional accountability.
Review financial/accountability information, funding disclosures, quality reporting, privacy/security controls and dated public updates.
Open accountability →What CHSPS makes inspectable
Six public-record systems support one trust model.
Accreditation status
Exact-number public verification is the authoritative current-status surface for a specific CHSPS accreditation record.
Verify accreditation →Normative requirements
Current standards, lifecycle dates, controlled PDFs and checksums are public; superseded editions are retained separately.
Standards Registry →Authority and independence
Decision bodies, seat structure, conflicts, recusals and impartiality safeguards are documented separately from applicant support.
Governance & impartiality →Decisions, complaints and appeals
Decision/status definitions and challenge routes are public so an adverse outcome is not governed by unpublished rules.
Complaints & appeals →Money and funding
Fees, nonprofit accountability information, funding disclosures and payment-outcome separation are inspectable.
Funding disclosures →Quality and security
CHSPS publishes quality reporting and a security-disclosure route so operational controls can be challenged and improved.
Quality reporting →Authority boundaries
Know what CHSPS is — and what it is not.
It develops controlled standards, evaluates defined organizational/program scopes and maintains public accreditation records.
Accreditation does not replace statutory licensing, regulatory approval or other legal authorization required by a jurisdiction.
A CHSPS organizational/program accreditation should not be presented as an individual practitioner license.
A CHSPS mark or public claim should not be stretched to an affiliate, service, location, product or person outside the verified record.
If something does not match
Use the route that preserves the right record.
A seal, status or scope looks wrong
Report a questionable CHSPS accreditation claim or mark use so it can be reconciled to the official record.
Report a claim →You need review, reconsideration or appeal
Use the published complaints and appeals framework rather than informal escalation or payment channels.
Open due-process routes →A requirement should change
Use Standards Action and public participation routes for proposed requirements, comments and standards-development activity.
View Standards Action →You found a vulnerability
Use the responsible security-disclosure process rather than placing sensitive details into an ordinary public form.
Security & disclosure →Primary records
The fastest way to inspect CHSPS.
Verify AccreditationExact-number live statusStandards RegistryCurrent normative documentsControlled DocumentsPolicies, procedures and publicationsGovernance & ImpartialityDecision authority and conflictsPublic Accreditation ActionsAdverse/restorative public recordQuality ReportingPublished operating measuresFunding DisclosuresExternal support transparencyUpdates & NoticesDated institutional changes